Miss Fisher and the Deathly Maze

I had intended this 100th entry to this blog to be a response to comments I got on my entry The development of Phryne Fisher that was published back in June. However, this summer, my real life has been quite hectic and I have had to work on two PhD applications and I have made some trips. Because of this, the activities on this blog have not been what it usually is and I am full of ideas for blogposts, so do not worry.

A few days ago, the Miss Fisher mobile game that Every Cloud Productions and Tin Man Games have made was finally available for Android and of course I had to download it right away. I have played through the first episode three times and the second only one, because I have not figured out yet how to restart it.

I mostly find it very good and I enjoy it immensely. However there are some aspects of it that do not really work for me. Mostly the characters behave as I expect them to, but the fact that everyone actually calls Jack Robinson "Jack" instead of "The Inspector" is a bit out of character for most of them. He does make the comment to Phryne in Murder on the Ballarat Train that she should call him Jack since everyone else does. However, this is not really true. Besides Phryne no one else actually calls him that besides his former in-laws George and Rosie Sanderson. It is usually "Sir" or "Inspector" and even though I can think of Mac actually calling him Jack, I cannot say the same for aunt Prudence.

The second thing I have issues with is the deduction parts. They are seriously irritating because it is not always obvious which evidences to combine to get a new lead on the case and you often end up spending to much time trying different combinations.

The biggest issue I have though is that, if you miss a clue, you end up needing to restart the whole game because you get stuck and there is no way out of the place you are in. It should be easier to move between previous stages. (There is an option to save the game, but that is not so easy to know if you are a gaming novice.)

The time frame is a bit confusing too. Sometimes it feels like the game takes place after season 3 and at times it feels like it is cannon, but it does not make sense because season 3 ended with Phryne flying away with her father. In the game Dot and Hugh have just married and are having issues and those issues are things they have been dealing with throughout season 3, but I have thought a lot about them actually having once married too. He is conservative and even though Dot is as well, she starts to grow under Phryne's care. I have thought that their relationship through season 3 gets rushed (mostly because of all the focus in that series gives to Phryne and Jack's relationship) and I think it is actually plausible to think they might not have solved it completely when they marry in Death do us Part at the end of the season.

Phryne and Jack's relationship also seems to have moved slowly forward. Based on their conversations it seems like they are dating and one of those dates (When they are holding hands at the opera...) gets interrupted by the murder in episode 1. They also faced with issues that they tackled in season 3, but that I think might actually be a bit of a soar spot between them even if they start dating. She is clear with not being one to settle down and he is a abit jealous when other men are around. It is, however, evident that she is startled at the thought of Jack with another woman. It feels like this ambivalent feelings are things it would take time for both of them to deal with. Of course I would love to see more kissing and cuddling, but the fact that they seem to have been out on some dates already and is talking about rescheduling the opera one that got interrupted because of the murder is comforting.

I absolutely love how involved Dot is in especially the second case. I love her under cover work in the first episode (I also love that Archie Jones makes a return in the second one!) and her participation in the second case is wonderful.

The overarching plot idea also seem plausible and the game is well made. I like a lot how the characters and backgrounds are painted. It has me thinking why they cannot use the same drawings for a comic book. That to me would seriously be amazing.

To be called out on your ignorance

Yesterday I went to a writing workshop with Australian writer Gillian Polack that I might talk about more in a different blogpost. In this one, I would like to focus mainly on one thing she said that has left me feeling a bit uncomfortable all day that I seriously feel I need to comment on. It might make a lot of people uncomfortable, but since Miss Fisher fans in general seems very open-minded I hope you can at least hear me out and reflect on it before you start trolling me.

A lot of fans hang out in a certain chat forum where we discuss just about everything. Most of us there are from The US and Europe and not from Australia. This is important because it plays into why I react so much to this.

Yesterday I learned that Australian readers are used to different types of characters and writing styles to European and American ones. I think it is important to realise that Phryne is actually written into this tradition (probably in the beginning not really intended for non-Australian ones either) by an Australian author. What Gillian Polack also said yesterday, was that, if Australian authors are to be sure to make it outside of Australia, they needs to tone down their "australianess" to please Americans and Europeans (which are the biggest markets for Australian literature outside of Australia).

During discussions among (mostly) American and European fans the differences in Phryne's book and TV persona often comes up. Book-Phryne is shallow, serious and a little spoiled, while TV-Phryne is exuberant, kind and feeling.What has been bothering me all day is not other fans's opinion on the books as much as that I have not seen any comment about the "strangeness" people feel in regard to the books's writing and characters might be attributed to different cultural preferences in fiction. This is, to be honest, rather typical reactions coming from Americans and Europeans to something that is out of their familiar area too.

I really do get the strangeness, I also think the books a bit weird at times. This post is made mostly because I have kind of been called out on my ignorance and it has made me uncomfortable all day. Even more in light of the changes that were made to the characters for the TV show and I wonder how much that really was because of a want to have it work better in other countries than Australia.

I guess Australia can be seen as part of Western culture. What the whole issue really shows is that even if we are all thinking of it as homogenous, we are still quite different. I also wonder what in Swedish litarture that others find strange and if a clue is to be found in the remakes of films Hollywood does.